In India itself, several sub-divisions and districts have gradually become Muslim dominated and the Hindus are either persecuted or made to flee. This is the reason why the Indian Religions having suffered immensely in the hands of medieval Muslim rulers....are ever critical of Muslim numerical dominance in their neighbourhood. Seldom any Muslim flees from a Hindu-dominated area but it is a fact that Hindu feel unsafe in Muslim-dominated localities for their honour and safety and do consider fleeing. There is a wide feeling among Hindus & Sikhs that Islam (or Muslims) is incompatible for peaceful & harmonious coexistence. Under such Hindu-Muslim suspicious co-living, the % of increasing Muslims in any society becomes a matter of concern. Muslims in India have grown 5-folds since partition against 3-fold increase of Hindus and others. Muslims are rapidly proliferating with decadal population growth rate 150% of the Hindus as per 2011 census of India. Hindus have already become a minority in 12 districts of India besides J&K. Muslims are changing the religious demography of India at the cost of Hindus. These are the reasons why any religious conversion to Islam is frowned upon.
The Real Pseudo-Secularists of India
All surreptitious activities of Nehru-Indira for garnering Muslim support and indulging in the ‘vote-bank’ appeasement politics could be linked to the origin of Pseudo-secularism. The real pseudo-secularists are the true Congress ideologues, accepting to ignore Hindu Interests from pre-independence periods when Jamat-e-Islamia was actively reshaping the contemporary societies to favour Muslims. They also remained indifferent to Jamat efforts colluding with British to suit Muslims. This mindset of Nehruvian Congress continued as ‘Muslim vote-bank’ protagonists after independence too. Congress party positioned itself as the champions of ‘Muslim causes’ in Hindu majority India essentially to garner their votes. Traditionally Muslim blindly follow the dictum of their clerics and during elections too, their Fatwas carried enmasse instructions to votes for a particular political party. Earlier only Congress party was the beneficiary but later other political outfits too started Muslim appeasement politics and tested various grades of success. Lalu and Mulayam Yadav's RJD & SP with an unholy 'M-Y' alliance, Mayawati’s Dalit-Muslim Bhai-Bhai, Mamata Banerji’s ‘Bangla Manush’ for the illegal Bangladeshi & Rohingya Muslims are some of the examples. Since the leaders of most of these ‘family parties’ are Hindus, the competition for the appeasements ran ethically low, often against national interest when their party workers colluded with administration to provide the illegal migrants with fake documents, providing citizenship in return for vote. It is unfortunate that Muslim & Christian clerics are paid handsome salaries by these political parties ignoring Hindus. Hindu temples are often kept hostage by these administrations but not the Islamic or Christian places of worships. Earnings from Hindu temples are re-distributed among Muslims & Christians but not vice-versa. Like these, these are several discriminatory favouritism shown to them. Larger the % of Muslims in any state, the larger the ‘vote-bank’ clouts…..Bengal, Kerala, Assam, Bihar, UP, Andhra, Maharashtra and MP being in the fore-front.
Most narratives made on TV-media by the so-called pseudo-secularists, are nothing but Hindu/Modi bashing tactics of some individuals having clear leaning or affiliations towards ‘vote-bank’ political parties. Plenty of pseudo-political liberalism have been written and said against Modi Govt during and before the Lok Sabha elections of 2019. Many of these pseudo-seculars had made forecasts of Modi Govt dividing India in his first 5 years. However, we see the reverse, that India has far strengthened in all spheres be it economy, foreign policy, defence, industries, development and so on. It only seems that fear-mongering is their business for which they make headlines in the leading newspapers and media houses either for the sake of self-portraying or mud-slinging on the adversaries and opponents and in turn, getting paid with Muslim votes for it. They all know how to sell the hotcakes of “anti-Modi, anti-Hindu or anti-India rants” that there is a huge market of buyers, both within and abroad. Even the High Courts of India had acknowledged the presence of pseudo-secuarists in India. They are present at all levels of our society and thriving in their business.
Concluding Thoughts
India that opted for secularism after independence, has many contradictions in its constitution itself defeating the very basis of secularism. Islam has been given a foothold in the Constitution through AIMPLB that influences and reshapes State policies and administration. Churches are administered from Rome. Sikh being a new faith, does have some influence on the local administration. Only Hinduism is prevented from having influence. In true sense, Indian constitution is not secular.
The pseudo-seculars are a distinct group who are ready to fall to any low to garner some Muslim electoral votes. ‘Muslim Vote-bank’ groups of politicians are revered pseudo-secularists in India. They are ready to enact any pro-Muslim policies often offending the interests of the native Hindus. This group of individuals are particularly averse to seeing or hearing the anti-Hindu activities indulged by radical Islamists or Christians. These groups are also supported by some biased NGOs and international organizations funded from abroad. The pseudo-secularists also try to form false narratives to influence others. These acts were earlier kept under carpets but in the vibrant democracy of Modi’s India, people do talk of these evils to which the pseudo-secularists get upset.